CO129-072 - Indviduals - 1858 — Page 73

ļ

A

weed

debt, to be the boil; and that in the case of another furate fustion

actually defrauded of her votin "by the in comprolionsible interposition of M. Caldwell to the misleading of a magistrate.

my

$797

If other illanger has been as carefully collated with

were there, I have original statements as we doubt this they too would have been found to be thieve

with the like linitations.

MAR 118

Annes he be comde,

Minutes of

Hens, for instance, if the Brommission had been led to engure whether. Mr. Caldwell haur hot domected Inwelf with lien ved brithel for operty. licensor of brottiels, by allowing hd if to be reported - then owner, by permitting it to stand in his the books of the Land Office and the Treasing, by

tertaining applications from the tenants about repairs or the like, by payment of banon-Rents and by Receipt of Rack rents

in

Jor de we

thead 28

528th

27

the

1 1 2 3 8 12th and 16

28. 1857-pp. 1-3 24-71

"My Setters Fer

*4

Thin

iston this subject, _), on by some one or mine of these methods, how would it have been possible for the Commission to find as they have done that Change "Two has been satisfactorily met and explained by "Mr Caldwell though there s sisted strong prima facie "gromies for bringing it; and to forth with respect to the other changes in the same

same group. Ispecify their

instance. In brevity's sake I at frevent specify

But dextend of it to every

" deducitle, in a one of the "Clearges deducitly application shapen lindorever disfigured, poun what I wrote on the

from 13th May last on subagnently, and I sery that when feurly and rationally stated, there is not one which is not established by there Munter of Evidence, and not one which, when so stated, will be found to have been condemned by the Refirst.

Iwas all that I ever charged agonist 13 th and 17th

or

1858

Repat

epat.

of Protest

Therefore that the result teas been othersive ?? ; cttributable partly to the erroneous method of computing the charges; but partly too to the regrest of the Commissing.

to correct and reduce them

Never

But there were other causes.

only-

I commot agree that they allowed themselves great. "Latitude as to the kind of evidence they admitted ; _ and Spefor His Excelleney, to my protest on the Anticct allowed to by the Commission in this portion of the Report.

were inter of cidence at Law so tightened by a. Comnt of Law or by their Commission, albeit not tied to bound by any rules of condence whatever beyond the general, mile that for the pumpove of averrtaining the truth

a eave the best evidence which the nature of that ave oudunits of is to be peceived. The Commission bonus went far beyond the Counts of Low in then determination to plint out evidence. For listance they decided not to allow-coidence of refutation, sitter on to relationship- to Chmmeter and conduct, to be taken down by the Clock, and for several most important days, during which the Prothels 'Connection was i

under investigation acted rigidly, upon t theat now ow-rule of their non making My Protest above refered to Rech them to relax it the... far, that the evidence of subsequent witnesses to Reputatio

tarken down, but the mirelief

abendy done by the exclusion of the first. This com as he youded strove Subsequent witnesses it is clear from the Report that then goidence, albeit not absolutely rejected, wow absolutely dineyarded,

anded, and that upon the dessumption_ twerk hearsing condence; an assumption which worry lawyer knows to be enoneous.

more

Another difficulty _ and for which the kom

that it was

komision

'D